Re: Coordinate mapping conventions...

Skip Montanaro (montnaro@ausable.crd.ge.com)
Fri, 23 Oct 92 09:38:11 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ethan Alpert: "conventions...."
Previous message: Joe Sirott: "Re: Coordinate mapping conventions..."
In reply to: Steve Emmerson: "Re: Coordinate mapping conventions..."

Steve Emmerson writes:

 > >It seems to me that support for components and data to coordinate mapping 
 > >can be solved by adding a small extension to the netCDF language. Why not
 > >add support for something analogous to C structures. For instance, we might
 > >have the following definition:

That would be too easy... :-) The FORTRAN folks would have no way of
accessing structure elements.

Skip (montanaro@crd.ge.com)

Next message: Ethan Alpert: "conventions...."
Previous message: Joe Sirott: "Re: Coordinate mapping conventions..."
In reply to: Steve Emmerson: "Re: Coordinate mapping conventions..."