- To: netcdfgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Conventions
- From: "Mark A Ohrenschall" <Mark.A.Ohrenschall@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:19:06 -0600
Russ Rew wrote: > One reason the issue of the type of valid_range keeps coming up is > byte data type and the question of how to represent whether bytes are > to be interpreted as signed or unsigned data. Why is this exception made for byte data? Why not handle unsigned byte data the same as you would unsigned short data? Conversely, why not allow unsigned data for any integer data type? Mark
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conventions
- From: Russ Rew
- Re: Conventions
- References:
- Re: Conventions
- From: Russ Rew
- Re: Conventions