"Sat\, 14 Mar 2009 08\:25\:05 +0100")
Message-ID: <sadr610kx5h.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Loop: netcdf-porting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Benoit Lecocq <blq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> (smtp0a.arcane-networks.net [213.251.175.43]); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:25:05
+0100
> (CET)
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9107/Sat Mar 14 06:25:15 2009 on
> smtp0a.arcane-networks.net
> X-Virus-Status: Clean
> X-Loop: netcdf-porting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> I try to upgrade the OpenBSD port with the latest release of NETCDF 4.0
> C/C++/Fortran.
> All is OK with the compilation but the regression test failed with utf8.
>
> I try this :
>
>
http://mailman.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/archives/netcdfgroup/2008/msg00189.html
>
> but I obtain :
>
> ...
> PASS: tst_lengths.sh
> *** creating UTF-8 test file tst_utf8.nc...ok.
> *** Tests successful!
> PASS: tst_utf8
>
> *** Testing ncgen and ncdump for UTF8 support...
> *** creating classic offset file with utf8 characters...
> *** dump and compare utf8 output...
> Binary files utf8.cdl and ./ref_tst_utf8.cdl differ
> FAIL: run_utf8_tests.sh
> =========================================
> 1 of 8 tests failed
> Please report to support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> =========================================
Howdy Benoit!
I am trying to arrange access to an OpenBSD system for testing.
Meanwhile, take a look at the tst_utf8.cdl and the ref_tst_utf8.cdl
files. The test is complaing that they are not the same. What is
different about them?
I have entered this into the netcdf support system as an issue that
will be tracked properly until it's resolved.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hartnett -- ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
