- To: Robert Mullenax <rmullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: LDM/GEMPAK NFS Question
- From: Gerry Creager N5JXS <gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:57:48 -0600
Then again, the only problem I can attribute to using nfs on RH9 is some
remaining virus traffic.
I'm running v3 here on Mesonet. We do some "interesting" cross-mounts without problems.
gerry Robert Mullenax wrote:
Under RH 6.2, we would have to specify NFS version 2, but this version of RH supports version 3. I would maybe look at NFS versions to see which version each box is running. As an aside, based on a lot of NFS use here.. I will say that you will be much happier in the long runif you just ran Solaris x86 instead of RH 9. NFS was and continues to be a problem on Linux. You will never getthe same NFS performance with a Linux NFS server as you would with a Solaris box (SPARC or x86). Robert -----Original Message----- From: Patrick O'Reilly [mailto:patrick.oreilly@xxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 12:29 PM To: ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gembud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: LDM/GEMPAK NFS Question Hello, I am switching my LDM machine from a Sun Solaris 8 machine to a PC running RedHat 9. This PC will feed the data via NFS to 4 Sun Solaris 8 machines, who in turn run GEMPAK scripts on the data and post imagery to the web. My prior setup had the 4 Suns mounting the NFS share of another Sun and things went well. I just made the switchover, i.e. made the PC/Redhat machine the NFS server to the 4 Suns, and the mount went fine. The problem is, now the GEMPAK scripts take a very long time to run on the Suns. A simple script takes a couple minutes where it used to take 20 seconds. I am assuming that this is because of the communication between the PC and the Suns via the NFS mount. Are there any NFS settings I can use to make the data read faster? Is this even the problem? Has anyone faced this problem? Any wisdom on the situation would be helpful. Thanks! Patrick _______________________________________ Patrick O'Reilly Meteorological Decision Support Scientist The STORM Project - University of Northern Iowa patrick.oreilly@xxxxxxx ~ ph: 319-273-3789 http://www.uni.edu/storm "No trees were killed in the making of this e-mail...however, a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced."
-- Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx Network Engineering -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.847.8578 Page: 979.228.0173 Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- References:
- LDM/GEMPAK NFS Question
- From: Patrick O'Reilly [mailto:patrick.oreilly
- LDM/GEMPAK NFS Question