Hi Ben,
I am sorry but I am not able to attend the teleconference on the 18th
--I will be in Copenhagen for the EGU scientific committee meeting.
Paolo will attend the telecon for the CNR/Univ. Florence.
--Stefano
Hello all,
It's been a while since we've had any substantial interactions
relating to the OGC CF-netCDF standardization effort, so here's a
brief status update.
The revised core specification document was resubmitted to the OGC
Architecture Board (OAB) a few weeks ago:
NetCDF Classic and 64-bit Offset Draft Core Standard 2010-01-19
<http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=37336>http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=37336
Two alternative approaches to the CF extension for the core are
available in draft form at:
<http://portal.opengeospatial.org/index.php?m=projects&a=view&project_id=327&tab=2&artifact_id=37586>http://portal.opengeospatial.org/index.php?m=projects&a=view&project_id=327&tab=2&artifact_id=37586
Note that one of those drafts is the one submitted previously
to the NASA Standards Process Group, who responded recently in an
email I forwarded to the CF-netCDF SWG.
So where do we go from here?
I have scheduled a telecon for the CF-netCDF SWG next Thursday,
February 18, at 11:00 AM US Eastern Time.
phone: +1 512 225 3050
passcode: 55699#
The agenda items I propose for the telecon are:
* If we have heard back from the OAB, we can discuss their comments
* The two alternate approaches to the CF extension standard
* Suggest topics for our CF-netCDF session the March OGC
Technical Committee Meeting
Please let me know if there are any other issues that need discussion.
Thanks.
-- Ben
_______________________________________________
CF-NetCDF-1.0.swg mailing list
CF-NetCDF-1.0.swg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.opengeospatial.org/mailman/listinfo/cf-netcdf-1.0.swg
