Hi Ben,
one item is to correlate with the format extension template available on
Wiki page
https://portal.opengeospatial.org/twiki/bin/view/WCSrwg/FormatTemplate
The goal of this template is to achieve coherence among all format
extensions.
As netCDF is the first such extension, I am glad about any feedback /
suggestions on the template.
Also, I will happily be available for any discussion.
-Peter
Ben Domenico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the last OGC meeting in Athens, the OGC Technical Committee members
> approved release of 09-018 Web Coverage Service (WCS) extension for
> CF-netCDF encoding, 1.0 as an OGC Discussion Paper. The document
> 09-018 is posted here:
> http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=32195
>
> The question now is what are the next steps? Related issues are:
>
> 1. How can we insure the Discussion Paper really does get adequate
> discussion?
>
> 2. After we are convinced that there has been adequate discussion,
> should a revised version of the paper be submitted as a "best
> practices paper" or should the next step be to propose it as a WCS
> extension standard?"
>
> 3. The 3 week deadline for submission of documents for voting at the
> next TC meeting (Boston, June 22-24) is approaching. Do we want to
> submit the paper as a best practices or extension standard document
> for consideration by the TC at that meeting? Clearly there has not
> been a lot of discussion as yet, but such a submission might be a
> catalyst.
>
> Your thoughts and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
>
> -- Ben
--
Dr. Peter Baumann
- Professor of Computer Science, Jacobs University Bremen
www.faculty.jacobs-university.de/pbaumann
mail: p.baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel: +49-421-200-3178, fax: +49-421-200-493178
- Executive Director, rasdaman GmbH Bremen (HRB 147737)
www.rasdaman.com, mail: baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxx
tel: 0800-rasdaman, fax: 0800-rasdafax, mobile: +49-173-5837882
"A brilliant idea is a job halfdone."
