`conduit` Mailing List Archives

2007 Archives: Listed By Date

Thursday, 06 December 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] departure from Unidata, support address reminder
  Author: Robert Mullenax [Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 04 December 2007
- Subject: [conduit] CONDUIT meeting 23 Jan in New Orleans
  Author: Linda Miller [lmiller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] departure from Unidata, support address reminder
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 27 November 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] Addendum: GFS missing/delays:
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] Addendum: GFS missing/delays:
  Author: Arthur A. Person [person@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] Addendum: GFS missing/delays:
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] Addendum: GFS missing/delays:
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] GFS missing/delays
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] GFS missing/delays
  Author: Mike Voss [voss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Monday, 12 November 2007
- Subject: [conduit] GEFS Spread/Average Fields
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 06 November 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [gembud] problems with NAM 104/255 CONDUIT files
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [gembud] problems with NAM 104/255 CONDUIT files
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] problems with NAM 104/255 CONDUIT files
  Author: Brent A Gordon [Brent.Gordon@xxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] problems with NAM 104/255 CONDUIT files
  Author: David Ovens [ovens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Monday, 22 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] delayed delivery of GFS 0.5 deg grib2 data?
  Author: Gerry Creager [gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx]
Sunday, 21 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] delayed delivery of GFS 0.5 deg grib2 data?
  Author: Mike Voss [voss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] delayed delivery of GFS 0.5 deg grib2 data?
  Author: Gerry Creager [gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx]
Thursday, 18 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] New to LDM and Conduit
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT change dates for GRIB2 GFS files
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] New to LDM and Conduit
  Author: Zehel, Samuel [zehel@xxxxxxx]
Wednesday, 17 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT change dates for GRIB2 GFS files
  Author: Mike Voss [voss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT change dates for GRIB2 GFS files
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT change dates for GRIB2 GFS files
  Author: Mike Voss [voss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] CONDUIT change dates for GRIB2 GFS files
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 16 October 2007
- Subject: [conduit] CONDUIT changes for NAM 40KM grid 212 implemented
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 09 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Kevin W. Thomas [kwthomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Wednesday, 03 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] GRIB2 to GRIB1 from pqact pipe?
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] GRIB2 to GRIB1 from pqact pipe?
  Author: Pete Pokrandt [poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 02 October 2007
- Subject: [conduit] Data Resource Available
  Author: Tom Baltzer [tbaltzer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Monday, 01 October 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Bryan C. Hahn [bryanh@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Friday, 28 September 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Kevin R. Tyle [ktyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] [ldm-users] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: David Knight [knight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] GFS change at 1200 UTC 25 September?
  Author: Harry Edmon [harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Friday, 21 September 2007
- Subject: [conduit] Changes to content of CONDUIT data stream
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Thursday, 13 September 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] 20070913: CONDUIT GRIB1 to GRIB2 transition
  Author: Mike Voss [voss@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] 20070913: CONDUIT GRIB1 to GRIB2 transition
  Author: Robert Mullenax [Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] 20070913: CONDUIT GRIB1 to GRIB2 transition
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] 20070913: CONDUIT GRIB1 to GRIB2 transition
  Author: Gerry Creager [gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] 20070913: CONDUIT GRIB1 to GRIB2 transition
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT troubles with NAM grids
  Author: Steve Chiswell [chiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT troubles with NAM grids
  Author: James Murakami [tenki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: Re: [conduit] CONDUIT troubles with NAM grids
  Author: Pete Pokrandt [poker@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
- Subject: [conduit] CONDUIT troubles with NAM grids
  Author: David Ovens [ovens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]