Randy...
I see no reason why not. As we have discussed for geo satellites,
though, we may need to make extensions to get some conventions
established where they do not already exist (e.g., 'band') so that
application developers can put in code to recognize these conventions.
tom
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Randy Horne <rhorne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> Is it a given that the CF conventions apply to data below, at, or above the
> surface of the earth ?
>
>
> very respectfully,
>
> randy
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Randy C. Horne (rhorne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
> voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
> url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cf-satellite mailing list
> cf-satellite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For list information or to unsubscribe, visit:
> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing_lists/
--
Tom Whittaker
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Space Science & Engineering Center (SSEC)
Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS)
1225 W. Dayton Street
Madison, WI 53706 USA
ph: +1 608 262 2759
